Is AI recommending Workable? Is this your brand? Claim it

How often ChatGPT mentions Workable for applicant tracking software, and how it stacks up against the tools that dominate the answers.

100%

of AI answers mention Workable

#3.0

avg rank when mentioned

1/1

questions it appears in

mentions tracked

Workable is one of the tools AI leans on, named in 100% of applicant tracking software answers, typically around rank #3.0. The job now is to defend that visibility as AI answers shift.

How Workable compares

Share of ChatGPT answers naming each tool, same 1 questions.

#	Tool
1	SmartRecruiters	100%
2	Workable ← this tool	100%
3	Greenhouse	100%
4	Ashby	100%
5	Lever	100%
6	iCIMS	100%
7	Breezy HR	100%
8	Zoho Recruit	50%
9	LeverTRM	50%
10	Manatal	50%
11	Teamtailor	50%
12	Pinpoint	50%

🔒 Unlock Workable's full AI report

Free account, see every engine, the trend over time, and which sources to win.

ChatGPT

Gemini

Perplexity

Google AI

🔒

Workable across every AI engineGemini · Perplexity · Google AI · Copilot

🔒

Visibility trend over timesee if you're rising or falling

Get Workable's full AI visibility report

Every engine, the trend, the exact sources to win, and alerts when it changes.

Free · no credit card · unsubscribe anytime

Where Workable shows up

The questions where ChatGPT currently names Workable.

Best applicant tracking software

A sample answer mentioning Workable

Prompt: Best applicant tracking software · ChatGPT · 2026-08-04

The best applicant tracking system (ATS) depends on your company size, hiring volume, and whether you need a standalone recruiting platform or an all-in-one HR suite. Based on recent industry reviews and analyst comparisons, these are among the strongest options in 2026. www.techtarget.com

ATS	Best for	Key strengths	Potential drawbacks
Greenhouse	Mid-size & enterprise	Structured interviews, scorecards, DEI features, analytics	Premium pricing
Ashby	Startups & scaling companies	Powerful reporting, recruiting + scheduling + analytics, AI features	Learning curve for smaller teams
Workable	SMBs & mid-market	Easy setup, AI sourcing, built-in job distribution	Advanced analytics less extensive
LeverTRM	High-growth companies	ATS + CRM, talent nurturing, automation	Higher cost for full feature set
Teamtailor	Employer branding	Excellent career sites, candidate experience, automation	Less suited to very large enterprises
iCIMS	Enterprise	Scalability, compliance, extensive integrations	Complex implementation
SmartRecruiters	Global organizations	Collaborative hiring, marketplace integrations	Can become expensive
Pinpoint	Internal recruiting teams	User-friendly, strong candidate experience	Smaller integration ecosystem
Manatal	Budget-conscious teams	AI candidate recommendations, affordable pricing	Fewer enterprise features
Breezy HR	Small businesses	Simple, affordable, drag-and-drop hiring pipeline	Limited advanced reporting

Recommendations by company size

1–50 employees: Workable, Breezy HR, Manatal
50–500 employees: Greenhouse, Ashby, Lever, Teamtailor
500+ employees: Greenhouse, iCIMS, SmartRecruiters

Features to prioritize

AI-assisted resume screening and candidate matching
Automated interview scheduling
Job board distribution
Custom hiring workflows
Candidate CRM and talent pools
Reporting and time-to-hire analytics
HRIS, payroll, Slack, and Microsoft Teams integrations
Compliance features (EEO, GDPR, OFCCP if applicable)

If you use Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace

Workable and Greenhouse offer mature integrations and are relatively easy to deploy.
Ashby is a strong choice for data-driven recruiting teams that want sophisticated analytics and automation.
iCIMS is often selected by large organizations needing enterprise-grade integrations and governance. www.techtarget.com

If you can share your: - company size, - annual hiring volume, - budget (e.g. under $100/month, $500/month, enterprise), and - whether you need only an ATS or a full HR platform,

I can narrow it down to the 3–5 best options for your situation.