How often ChatGPT mentions Fellow for ai meeting assistants, and how it stacks up against the tools that dominate the answers.
Share of ChatGPT answers naming each tool, same 1 questions.
| # | Tool | Visibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Granola | 100% | |
| 2 | Otter.ai | 100% | |
| 3 | Fathom | 100% | |
| 4 | Fireflies.ai | 100% | |
| 5 | tl;dv | 80% | |
| 6 | Avoma | 80% | |
| 7 | Gong | 40% | |
| 8 | Fellow ← this tool | 20% | |
| 9 | Zoom Workplace | 20% | |
| 10 | Circleback | 20% | |
| 11 | Read.ai | 20% | |
| 12 | Krisp | 20% |
Free account, see every engine, the trend over time, and which sources to win.
The questions where ChatGPT currently names Fellow.
If you mean AI tools that join/record meetings, transcribe them, summarize them, and extract action items, these are the strongest options in 2026:
| Tool | Best for | Standout strength |
|---|---|---|
| Granola | Individuals, executives, founders | Excellent notes without a meeting bot |
| Fathom | Best free option | Generous free plan + very good summaries |
| Fireflies.ai | Teams & sales | Integrations, searchable meeting history, CRM workflows |
| Otter.ai | All-around use | Mature transcription + meeting search/Q&A |
| Avoma | Sales/customer teams | Conversation intelligence + CRM integration |
| tl;dv | Distributed teams | Search, clips, and meeting knowledge |
| Fellow | Team productivity | Meeting agendas, notes, action items, follow-through |
| Read AI | Meeting analytics | Engagement and meeting-performance insights |
Recent 2026 comparisons broadly agree that the capture/transcription itself is becoming commoditized; the bigger differences are whether the assistant uses a bot, privacy/data handling, integrations, and what happens to the notes afterward. zapier.comwww.rock.so
🥇 Best overall: Granola
Great if you want an assistant that feels like an enhanced personal notebook rather than a bot visibly joining your call. It's particularly appealing for executives, founders, and people who already take some notes themselves. www.rock.so
💰 Best free: Fathom
Probably the easiest place to start. Current 2026 testing highlights its unlimited recording on Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams and fast post-meeting summaries. aitechrankings.com
🏢 Best for a company/sales team: Fireflies
Strong if you want transcripts to feed into Salesforce, HubSpot, Slack, project-management tools, etc. Its searchable meeting archive is also a major advantage. zapier.comotter.ai
📝 Best established all-rounder: Otter
A good choice when you want broad platform support, live transcription, collaborative notes, and the ability to ask questions across your meetings. otter.ai
📈 Best for sales conversation intelligence: Avoma
More specialized toward customer-facing teams, with scheduling, conversation intelligence, and CRM workflows. otter.ai
One important consideration: tell participants when you're recording/transcribing. Consent requirements vary by jurisdiction, and the privacy expectations around AI notetakers are increasingly important. www.wired.com
If I were choosing today:
- Solo professional → Granola
- Want free → Fathom
- Sales team → Fireflies
- General business use → Otter
- Sales/revenue organization → Avoma
If you tell me Zoom vs. Teams vs. Google Meet, individual vs. team, and your budget, I can narrow it down to the best 2–3 for you.